Which statement correctly reflects whether D must receive the goods to keep or dispose of them?

Which statement correctly reflects whether D must receive the goods to keep or dispose of them?

• A. There is no requirement that D must receive the goods to keep or dispose of them.
• B. There is a strict requirement that D must receive the goods to keep or dispose of them.
• C. D must benefit from receipt.
• D. D must be unaware of possession.

Answer: (A)

The key idea here is that the wrongdoing is about possession and what you do with stolen goods, not about the act of receiving them from someone else. If D has the goods in their possession or under their control and then decides to keep or dispose of them, that can meet the offense's elements even without a separate step of “receiving” the goods. Receiving is just one way someone might come to possess stolen property, but it isn’t a required starting point for the act of keeping or disposing. The other statements introduce requirements that aren’t necessary: insisting on a strict receipt ignores other paths to possession; claiming D must benefit from the receipt adds an additional motive not required; and saying D must be unaware of possession contradicts typical knowledge or intent elements that can be part of the offense.

The key idea here is that the wrongdoing is about possession and what you do with stolen goods, not about the act of receiving them from someone else. If D has the goods in their possession or under their control and then decides to keep or dispose of them, that can meet the offense's elements even without a separate step of “receiving” the goods. Receiving is just one way someone might come to possess stolen property, but it isn’t a required starting point for the act of keeping or disposing.

The other statements introduce requirements that aren’t necessary: insisting on a strict receipt ignores other paths to possession; claiming D must benefit from the receipt adds an additional motive not required; and saying D must be unaware of possession contradicts typical knowledge or intent elements that can be part of the offense.